Wednesday 5 November 2014

Breaking News – The Manchester Devolution

It was announced over the weekend that George Osbourne has agreed to give three UK cities “London-style” rules, in the sense that they will be given their own powers to run their own affairs. The first city to undergo this change is Greater Manchester.

The move – agreed with Nick Clegg, the Lib Dem leader - comes as all three main parties compete to offer English regions more devolution at the same time as Scotland is given extra powers to raise its own taxes in the wake of the independence referendum. We’ve got the latest information for you in this blog post.

Details of the Devolution


The entire devolution has been estimated to cost £1 billion, and a mayor of Greater Manchester will be elected, taking over the duties of Police Commissioner. The package includes:

·      Control of the region’s £500m skills budget
·      A £450m tram extension to Trafford Park
·      £300m in house-building cash
·      Power to combine health and social care funds together - and oversee back-to-work schemes
·      A pledge to make Manchester a science capital

This would also mean a new ‘Oyster card’ for the region that would include the buses, he said – one that would work ‘better’ than London’s. Transport for Greater Manchester, however, are already in the process of rolling out its 'get me there' smart ticketing system to the region's trams, trains and buses.  It’s been argued that the devolution deal will create jobs, better transport and more responsive policing.

What are the arguments for this deal?


1.     The person is directly accountable to the public - so if they mismanage the new power and money, the public can vote them out.
2.     It lessens the impact of any huge fall out among the existing council leaders, whose unity currently props up the system.
3.     It provides Manchester with a representative on the world stage.

What are the arguments against this deal?



There are major fears among councillors at a local level that this will drain power away from grassroots communities - particularly over issues such as planning.

No comments:

Post a Comment